Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin (Ekaterinburg, Russia):

Yu. N. Loginov, Dr. Eng., Prof., Metal Forming Dept., Leading Researcher of M. N Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, RAS Ural Branch, e-mail: j.n.loginov@urfu.ru
G. V. Shimov, Cand. Eng., Researcher, Metal Forming Dept.
N. I. Bushueva, Graduate Student

The work aim is the mathematical modeling of the austenitic steel pipes sink drawing process to establish the effect of the pipe wall thickness on the material stress-strain state and to predict the martensitic transformation development. The drawing process was simulated for thin-walled and thick-walled pipes by the finite element method using the DEFORM-2D software package. There are determined the shape change and deformations distribution, the deformations intensity and the average normal stress for seven variants of pipes with different wall thickness ratios and diameter are determined. Distribution patterns for two extreme variants are shown. The difference is shown in the stress state at the drawing process of thin-walled and thick-walled pipes. The change in the average normal stress in time t of a particle passage through the deformation zone for the outer and the inner surfaces for a thin-walled and extra thick-walled pipe is given. In either case, the compression stresses up to –400 MPa for the inner surface and tensile stresses for the outer surface up to +200 MPa are prevail at the entrance to the deformation zone. Inside the deformation zone, a thin-walled pipe is characterized by the presence of approximately equal compressive stresses both on the outer surface and on the inner one. However, the stresses are close to zero outside and reach –600 MPa inside for a thick-walled pipe. The deformation zone numerical simulation in the sink drawing made of austenitic steel showed that there are differences in the stress-strain state in the case of processing thin-walled and thick-walled pipes. The performed calculations and comparison with the literature data on the stress state influence on the cold martensitic transformation process made it possible to predict the development of this transformation in the drawing process. It was revealed that during thin-walled pipes drawing process are created more favorable conditions for the phase transition development.
This work was performed with partial financial support of Resolution No. 211 of the Government of the Russian Federation, contract No. 02.A03.21.

1. Palengat M., Chagnon G., Favier D., Louche H., Linardon C. et al. Cold drawing of 316L stainless steel thin-walled tubes: Experiments and finite element analysis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2013. Vol. 70. pp. 69–78.
2. Chuiko P. I., Kolesnikov V. N., Savin G. A. Cold drawing of stainless steel tubes on a short mandrel. Metallurgist. 1972. Vol. 16. pp. 202–204.
3. Schrek A., Brusilová A., Švec P., Gábrišová Z., Moravec J. Analysis of the drawing process of small-sized seam tubes. Metals. 2020. Vol. 10. Iss. 6. No. 709.
4. Chobaut N., Drezet J.-M., Mischler S., Nguyen V., De Marco B. et al. Miniaturized tube fixed plug drawing: Determination of the friction coefficients and drawing limit of 316 LVM stainless steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2019. Vol. 263. pp. 396–407.
5. Loginov Yu. N., Demakov S. L., Illarionov A. G., Karabanalov M. S. Evolution of defects in the production of capillary copper tubes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2015. Vol. 224. pp. 80–88.
6. Loginov Yu. N., Demakov S. L., Illarionov A. G., Shalaeva M. S. Specific features of tool wear in adaptable drawing of capillary pipes. Journal of Friction and Wear. 2014. Vol. 35.Iss. 4. pp. 304–310.
7. Ruminski M., Luksza J., Kusiak J., Packo M. Analysis of the effect of die shape on the distribution of mechanical properties and strain field in the tube sinking process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 1998. Vol. 80-81. pp. 683–689.
8. Lebedev A. A., Kovalchuk B. I., Kosarchuk V. V., Zaitseva L. V. Kinetics of martensitic transformation in the plastic deformation of chromium-nickel austenitic steels. Strength of Materials. 1985. Vol. 17. pp. 1185–1191.

9. Xu Q.-H., Peng Z.-X., Li M.-Y., Li C.-Q., Liu J. Evolution of mechanical and magnetic properties and martensite transformation during cold drawing of 304H stainless steel. Journal of Plasticity Engineering. 2020. Vol. 27, Iss. 7. pp. 130–138.
10. Sunil S., Kapoor R. Effect of Strain Rate on the Formation of Strain-Induced Martensite in AISI 304L Stainless Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: 2020. Vol. 51. pp. 5667–5676.
11. Maltseva L. A., Loginov Yu. N., Maltseva T. V., Sharapova V. A. Effect of the state of stress on the strain-induced martensite formation in 03Kh14N11K5M2YuT steel. Russian Metallurgy (Metally). 2013. Vol. 2013. No. 9. pp. 706–711.
12. Sohrabi M. J., Naghizadeh M., Mirzadeh H. Deformation-induced martensite in austenitic stainless steels: A review. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering. 2020. Vol. 20, Iss. 4. No. 124.
13. Beese A. M., Mohr D. Effect of stress triaxiality and Lode angle on the kinetics of strain-induced austenite-to-martensite transformation. Acta Materialia. 2011. Vol. 59. pp. 2589–2600.
14. Parshin S. V., Parshin V. S. Influence of drawing conditions and type of workpiece processing on the development of surface defects. Stal. 2013. No. 8. pp. 50–52.
15. Vydrin А. V., Yakovleva К. Yu. Mathematical modeling of the stress-strain state during pipe drawing on a self-aligning plug based on the joint application of the projection method and finite element method. Proizvodstvo prokata. 2016. No. 1. pp. 26–33.
16. Nima Dabiri Farahani, Ali Parvizi, Ali Barooni, Sina Anvari Naeini. Optimum curved die profile for tube drawing process with fixed conical plug. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2018. Vol. 97. pp. 1–11.
17. Orlov G. A. Cold rolling and drawing of pipes: tutorial. Ekaterinburg: UrFU, 2011. 188 p.
18. Boutenel F., Delhomme M., Velay V., Boman R. Finite element modelling of cold drawing for high-precision tubes. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 2018. Vol. 346, Iss. 8. pp. 665–677.
19. Zaera R., Rodríguez-Martínez J. A., Casado A., Fernández-Sáez J., Rusinek A. et al. Constitutive model for analyzing martensite formation in austenitic steels deforming at high strain rates. International Journal of Plasticity. 2012. Vol. 29. pp. 77–101.
20. Beese A. M., Mohr D. Effect of stress triaxiality and Lode angle on the kinetics of strain-induced austenite-to-martensite transformation. Acta Materialia. 2011. Vol. 59. pp. 2589–2600.
21. Van Beeck J., Kouznetsova V. G., Van Maris M. P. F. H. L. The mechanical behaviour of metastable austenitic steels in pure bending. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2011. Vol. 528, Iss. 24. pp. 7207–7213.
22. El-Tahawy M., Jenei P., Kolonits T., Han G., Park H. et al. Different Evolutions of the Microstructure, Texture, and Mechanical Performance During Tension and Compression of 316L Stainless Steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2020. Vol. 51. pp. 3447–3460.
23. Orlov V. V., Korneev А. Е., Korneev А. А., Gudenko А. S., Simich-Lafitskaya Е. М. et. al. Influence of deformation martensite on corrosion resistance of NPP equipment and pipelines from austenitic steels. Tyazheloe mashinostroenie. 2020. No. 9. pp. 10–15.
24. Bakirov М. B., Korneev А. Е., Mazepa А. G., Vystavkin I. А. Modeling and control of the degree of cyclic damage of austenitic steel pipelines at NPPs after long service life. Zavodskaya laboratoriya. 2002. Vol. 68, No. 9. pp. 36–41.
25. Zubchenko А. S., Banyuk G. F., Kharina I. L., Fedorov А. V. Corrosion cracking of austenite chromium-nickel steels. Voprosy atomnoy nauki i tekhniki. Seriya: Obespechenie bezopasnosti AES. 2008. No. 23. pp. 76–84.